JEWISH HISTORY

A TROTSKYIST LOOKS AT JEWISH HISTORY

  • About

IT IS NECESSARY TO OPPOSE A “PALESTINIAN” ANTISEMITIC STATE

Posted by Felix Quigley on February 9, 2010
Posted in: Uncategorized. Leave a Comment
1.  Palestine belongs to the Jews as their ancestral land, a land inhabited by Jews continuously
for thousands of years.  The Jewish connection to Palestine was recognized by the “Internationl
Community” in the form of the League of Nations’ mandate over Palestine.

 

This statement appears repeatedly in advocacy articles written from a pro-Israeli viewpoint, an
example being quoted below.  The statement is also corroborated by authoritative historians, but these
works are not available on the web.
On the other hand, it is easy to establish and document definitively that the “international community”
has accepted the Jewish historical claim to Palestine, and consequently the claim of the Jewish people
to a national home in Palestine.  To substantiate this statement, I quote from the preamble to the text
of the League of Nations Mandate:
“Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory
should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally
made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty,
and adopted by the said Powers, in favour of the establishment in
Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly
understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and
religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the
rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country ; and
Whereas
recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of
the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting
their national home in that country…”

 

(The text quoted above may be found on many web sites; we selected to quote from the site of
Yale
Law School
).
Among the parties present at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, were Felix Frankfurter and Chaim
Weizmann on behalf of the Zionist movement, and the Emir Feisal on behalf of the Hedjaz (now
Saudi Arabia).  In the course of their meetings, Feisal wrote a letter addressed to Frankfurter and
dated 3 March, 1919.  The letter, which may be found at

 

http://www.eretzyisroel.org/~samuel/feisal2.html

 

stated:
We Arabs, especially the educated among us look with the deepest sympathy
on the Zionist movement. Our deputation here in Paris is fully acquainted
with the proposals submitted yesterday by the Zionist Organisation to
Peace Conference, and we regard them as moderate proper. We will do our
best, in so far as we are concerned, to help them through:
we will wish
the Jews a most hearty welcome home.
Unless Feisal himself recognized the Jewish historical claim to Palestine, there would be no meaning
to the sentence, “we will wish the Jews a most hearty welcome home”.  Hence it is clear that the
Jewish claim to Palestine was already well established even among the Arabs, when the League of
Nations granted the British a mandate over Palestine on July 24, 1922.
As an example of the many web sites which deal with the Jewish connection to Palestine I quote from

 

http://www.rosenblit.com/Palestine.htm
:
In 135 CE, after having long-become a province of the Roman Empire,
Judea’s third and last revolt against Rome was crushed by Emperor Hadrian;
but Rome’s army also suffered devastating losses, including the complete
annihilation of its illustrious XXII Legion. In furtherance of Rome’s
costly victory, Hadrian — in a blatant propaganda effort to delegitimize
further national Jewish claims to the Land — renamed the province
Palestina (Palestine) after the Philistines, a long-extinct Aegean people
who had disappeared from History approximately a millennium earlier.
However, although the province had been converted from Judea (– Land of
the Jews –) into Palestina (– Land of the Philistines –), it continued
to be populated by Jews, together with substantial minority populations of
Christians and Samaritans, but hardly any Arabs, at least until the great
Arab invasion of 638 CE, as a result of which, 73 years later, Byzantium’s
Christian basilica known as the Church of Saint Mary of Justinian, which
then sat atop Jerusalem’s Temple Mount, was remade into Islam’s Al-Aksa
mosque. But even under the rule of the Arab and all subsequently
superseding empires, the Jewish people nevertheless maintained a
continuous national presence in “Palestine” — right up until the
resurrection therein of the Jewish nation-state of Israel in 1948 CE.”

Posts navigation

  • Recent Posts

    • IT IS NECESSARY TO OPPOSE A “PALESTINIAN” ANTISEMITIC STATE
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.com
Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Parament by Automattic.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Powered by WordPress.com